| | |
| FORUMS > Doncaster RLFC > Dons v Dewsbury Sunday 27th August 2023 |
 |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 3493 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Aug 2011 | 13 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Fixtures
Wednesday 23th August Table
1. Dewsbury 17, 31, Champions
2. Hunslet 17, 28, +300
3. Dons 17, 26, +240
4. Oldham 16, 23, +264
5. Workington 16, 20, +135
6. N Wales 17, 12, +41
7. Rochdale 16, 10, -137
Dons to finish second We must beat Dewsbury & Hunslet must lose at Workington. There must also be a 61 point gain for the Dons in points difference. For example, if the Dons won by 40, Hunslet would need to lose by 21 or more. [iThis is an example, not an expectation! [/i 
London really seem to be going backwards, don't they? I do fear somewhat for their future.
| | |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Moderator | 17997 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Sep 2002 | 22 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
|
The points have been awarded to Rochdale.
Yes London have been a huge disappointment. Years of building has collapsed. I don't think it does any favours to them that Broncos have got worse. There will be players that Skolars were getting before that will now be on Broncos radar, that wouldn't have been if they were in Super League
| | |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Moderator | 100947 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Sep 2002 | 22 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
|
I don't think it's a coincidence that they've gone backwards since 'Hector' McNeil left shortly followed by Jermaine Coleman.
| | | |
| | |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
9.36865234375:5
|
| |
|
