why was there nowt wrong at widnes it was cos there was no dual reg players as soon as they come back in the team flops it dont work for us sheffield fev batley and now barrow all doing ok without i said earlier it dont work for us you mite get individual performances that stand out but not as a team cowling played most games for us in a settled team and we did ok ,if the club cant or wont see this they must be told rant over..

Thought Batley had an agreement with Huddersfield .

Think Halifax, Sheffield & Fev stand alone. They have u20 sides though to bring players on .

Have a look on loverugbyleague who is playing for Swinton on Thursday.

Although I donot agree with Dual Reg at least the players we get from Wakefield are young fringe players.

It's on the Warrington board too ... Tony Smith really is using the rules in the extreme

Wakefield s Mariano on month loan at Fev. Ok not dual reg but not much difference.
Batley had 2 Huddersfield forwards on dual reg in side at Leigh (not a good advert for dual reg)

Sorry Scorer please explain the Batley at leigh comment. Do you mean the score. Dual Reg agreements are to give young Super league players game time.

There is a difference between Loan & Dual Reg. Loan should be for an agreed prriod.

Only just got back from our weekend away so not been able to comment on the match till now. On the very few occasions we tried to throw the ball about we caused them problems and scored tries or made good yards.So what did we do , started playing one out stuff and straight into Havens hands. When the bonus point was looking out of our grasp with about 10 minutes to go we started to play then and scored again and were caused them bother.

For me it was points lost and not for the first time I drove away from Whitehaven really disappointed. Haven were average at best and we were worse in my opinion. Some people will say the conditions were not conducive for fast through the hands rugby but i say thats rubbish. We should have had a go at them and gone to win the game.