You Cone

Phil Clarke's view www.skysports.com/opinion/story/ ... 77,00.html

Phil Clarke's view www.skysports.com/opinion/story/ ... 77,00.html

Well said phil clarke, but nothing will done because if the rfl admit all this their whole structure will collapse like a house of cards and a lot clubs will be asking a lot of questions and maybe even consider legal action.

Jesus wept....I really can't wait til you lot go back to school.
Lets see......you launch an action against the rfl....you win and get £1,000,000 in damages....then rot in Champ 1 for the rest of your life.....
Good call

The avatar is a bit of a wind up towards those people who think the views of a few Widnes fans is representative of all Widnes fans. It is surprising how many braindead barstewards on the VT cannot differentiate between individual viewpoints.

Did you notice the mods merged my thread questioning the RFL ' s Integrity , so it dissapeared into a Hull/KR bitchfest

When I put it on again as it's point had been lost in thread drift it was once again removed

It would seem criticism of the RFL is not allowed on there anymore

They're corrupted by the mighty message board powers that they yield

Freedom of speech, just watch what you say...

I was neither mocking or condescending...I simply pointed out that any legal action would, regardles of the outcome, ensure that the plaintiffs would never see SL Rugby.

My we are honoured.The Bronco fan gracing us with his presence.
Your'e not suggesting that the RFL would take revenge on any club taking legal action against them by punishing them with exclusion from SL,even if they met the criteria are you.Tut,tut.They wouldn't stoop to that level.

The RFL will do as they please. It puzzles me when fans act suprised when the RFL ride roughshod........it has always been the way and especially sice SKY came to the rescue.
Any attempt to sue the RFL would probably result in a/ Lawyers making money and b/ the demise of the plantiff club(s).
Let's face it, if a club was to go down this route, they would have to remain squeaky clean thereafter......1 false move or a slight break of rules and the RFL would come down on them like a ton of bricks.
A perfect example is the (rumoured) instruction by the RFL to the SL chairmen that they should vote to accept our solution to the finacial problems we had in 2005.

To which our then but now late great chairman, Tony Chambers did the right thing and abstained and saved your sorry asses.

Correct....and a very generous gesture this was considering you went down that year....one of the reasons I have a real soft spot for Widnes.

Hmmmm!