Not pointless at all you moron.We all have opinions and I think Craven,Briscoe,and Jack Owens are better than Hulme.High balls and hulmes defence not the best.Can't play halfback as seen him in t reserves.You and I have different opinions so if don't like it do not read it.

My view of Hulme is that he can fill in at hooker, scrum half or full back. But, he would never be first choice in any of those spots. His asset is kick returns at full back but that's off set by the tendancy to drop a bomb and I don't recall many try saving tackles.

Craven is the far better all round player and I'm surprised how so many people have forgotten the impact he made when he started in the first team. The biggest disappointment this season for me was him getting that bad injury.

I'd say spot on as usual mate.

Moron is it? I'm not the one who can barely string an intelligible sentence together. How you can take the moral high ground over differing opinions and then resort to name calling says a lot about you.

You reference to Ben Davies was was irrelevant and now you're using a completely different argument.

You're right though, I try as often as I can not to read your grammatically illiterate and smiley ridden drivel. Thanks for reminding me to put you back on ignore.

I haven't forgotten about him. I can't wait to see the lad in Super League. He was our best player until injured, and what was the punishment for the thug challenge on him? Nowt.

Now now gentlemen we are all brother Vikings here. Lets not resort to name calling.

Damn straight!

Think you are the one who knows nothing about rugby.You started the trouble and I be happy to chat in person to explain your utter rubbish. Players come and go and the way some on here talk is as if Hulme was a lockyer.Ben Davies was highly rated at Wigan so why pointless.

I call hated than adored.

Feck me! You're fecking internet warrior!

on the other hand, I am God i just sometimes choose to be wrong just to make you feeble mortals feel good