Not really as turnover figures can be ' adjusted ' to suit , maybe on profit ?

Oh hang on though , the other year you made a million loss , that would mean the players would have to pay you to play for you

Turnover i.e. not profit

....and its strife

What name u going under next year then seeing as tho uve been "saved" once again by the rf..err i mean your chairman

...

How dare we defend our own club on our own board!

What were we thinking?


If you need to annoy a 'retard', try shouting at the mirror.

nice put down pepe

Come back with your petulant snipes when your club can stand on it's own 2 feet without being propped up (financially or otherwise) as it has been since day one.

Would you rather have 1000 extra travelling support per season to fill your coffers or 20 French people? Idiot.

As I said , turnover can easily be ' adjusted'

So can everything, so what’s the answer?

Smokey TA’s point system, maybe?

No cap at all?

Can't believe a hardlyquin fan feels that he can say who should have a franchise and who shouldn't. Get your own house in order first and actually add something to the competition

Thought i'd finally wade through some of this... Chris has been a busy man

well done Dalton



My summary... go tell that to the RFL... It aint our problem!