Please enlighten us as to what was wrong with it ?

the tackle was absoulote fine big heavy contact

That has nothing to do with us been soft.

Enlighten us to why it should have been a penalty...was a good hard tackle and wouldnt have been botherd if it was on a FC player.

What I remember of it now, Gilmour was up ended and put in a dangerous position.

wrong

Bolloxs.....if we cant tackle like that then may as well give up...was he injured...no.

Only takes him to land awkwardly from that height for a serious injury to happen, him not getting injured has nothing to do with it. I thought the rfl was trying to stamp out these type of tackles.

I thought it was a penalty, no big deal.

Nope. One leg [imight[/i have gone [islightly[/i above vertical but he was slammed down onto his back, not his neck or head. If you want to ban tackles like that then we might as well give up and go watch soccer.

On another point what the f00k was Obst doing kicking to touch on the the long side and against the wind when he didnt find it?

Disagree with you felt the Manu tackle on Gilmour was the worst tackle in the match.

He lifted Gilmour above the vertical and then smashed him down it was only Gilmour twisting that stopped it being head first but after Manu puts him down he goes right down on top off him.

Should have been a clear cut penalty

What the fook was obst kicking to touch for? we have westerman and tickle who can kick the ball twice as far.

Real lack of leadership on the pitch today

Then you're watching the wrong sport, chief. Soccer awaits.

All your players called Tomkins? Laurence on Yeaman?

Every player on the pitch knew that it was a completely fair and legal tackle. There was no response from Giants players whatsoever which there would have been otherwise. Yeaman's later on was deffo a penalty but if you stop/penalise tackles like Manu and Yeaman's hit on Grix then you may as well pack up and go home.