Not so much. If you were as opposed to Cockayne's retention as you claim, you'd hardly have put money directly into his sponsorship appeal, you'd have bought a lottery ticket or sent Rovers a cheque. The reality is that you comfortable coming on here and telling FC what to do in a non-criminal case, when Rovers and you did the opposite in one involving conviction for violent crime.

Really? Hasn't he had enough chances already? For me, being unavailable for the play-off game was a right kick in the teeth for his team mates who'd played through injury last season to get the team there. To continue where he left off shows huge disrespect to them IMO.

I've said numerous times that I back Agar either way but if I had the call then providing the players still believed in him then I would give him a final chance.

Not sure they do tho mate.

What do you think will happen, wolfie? Think we could do with a conclusion as soon as possible.

Got to admire his rlhonestyrl, his rlpersistencyrl, and smile at his rlnaivetyrl.

An all round nice chap.

Tansey, an amiable fool, hurts only himself with his drink splurges. However, as it has now had a direct impact on his ability to do his job on at least three occasions, he must go. I hope Hull can/will have the moral fibre to get rid.

Were you pleased with your club's backing of good ol' Charlie?

Good old wormy

Steady on, Wolfie. Anyone would think I've hacked your account!

You've said we have being Sammut anyday now for the last month !

He's just waiting for Willie to land at John Lennon International and then they'll share a cab over here

And I stand by it.

I wish i was as confident as you, i`ve not seen or heard nothing to convince me that this is going to happen

rlSackedrl

Now he's officially gone we can discuss it on the newer thread with a less ambiguous title.