Oh good, at lest we can take the moral high ground whilst we're slowly been squeezed to death in our home stadium

ang about wasn't Pearson dismissed as City chairman due to nicking citys sponsors for FC.

No.

I'm sure the local media will be all over it. Oh wait, David Burns says Allam should get ownership of the stadium and the HDM printed City's team photo with a heading of "The Tigers". But apart from that they're totally impartial.

Yet another ridiculous right wing response from you. Cue yet another sarcastic reply.

Realistically, what would you (or Jake) want the council to do? Unless some knight in shining armour gives them an option, the most they can manage is a bit of sabre-rattling on your behalf, IMO. The little difference that is likely to make would be as likely to be bad as good.

Iam afraid if AP had that much class,he wouldn't have done what he did to allam and the situation we find ourselves in would't have occured.

So it's quite acceptable for the owner of the KC SMC to treat one of its tenants like dirt?

can you tell us what he did, I'm a bit confused now?

When you get sacked on the spot,dont talk about it,and dont appeal it,you haven't forgot to put sugar in allams tea.Iam sure somebody in your position wilf can enlighten us all,so we dont get the wrong impression.

IIRC if there were evidence of breach of terms of either the head lease or sub tenancy arrangements, investigations can be brought into play to review SLAs and so on, forensic audit of the SMC's accounts. Whether that's happened and/or if it's not clear-cut, the reality is that the relationship between the council and the SMC is in the ter. As you allude to it'd be like throwing petrol on a bonfire the council don't have the resources or stomach to marshal. This is the latest in a long line of incremental pieces of damage to our club, however. Individually small, cumulatively damaging. A great sporting philanthropist with the privilege of running the stadium of the city's two biggest fanbases - you'd imagine optimising utilisation and attendances for both clubs would be a priority. Unless you have a vested interest in one of them, in which case the council dropped a bollock to start with. Oh, wait..

Right wing response? Is that because hull city council is labour or because they're spineless?

Are you some tree hugging leftie?

Aye.

The big question is whether or not running that stadium is an expensive privilege. If it is then the council have to outsource the power with the responsibility, or take it on themselves.

I'm not defending Allam's use of that power, but if the SMC is running a real loss on Hull FC games and can save money by not opening a stand, without breaching their contract with the club, I can see why Allam would make that a priority. A 3 sided KC still provides ample capacity, tbf.

I think ultimately, if the smc genuinely is loss making, a new settlement will have to be reached at some point. What exactly that would be, I'm not sure - but we're unlikely to see it while Allam is on the scene.

If SMC accounts paint an unrealistically bleak picture, the council's hand is obviously much stronger.

Don't appeal it...what a crock of 5hit