I feel Thorman is a good signing.

He will organise our attack, and has a good short kicking game.

He is better than,what we have got at the club at the moment.

Thorman to play at 7 - Horne at 6.

This will enable us,to get an overseas replacement (non fed,or Australian)for Carvell be it by, the release of Webster or Dykes - or both.

Maybe Wiki is coming, therefore Webster had to be released?

I think this is all part of a bigger plan and I think we should cut Richard Agar a bit of slack!!
As for Thorman, I always feared him when he played against us for the Quins and he has a great kicking game. Not a full back though! I think we will go with 3 halves next season to be on the safe side, so it's either Dykes or Webster to go for me!

Perhaps one more player to come in, unless Dykes goes, then we could have some more spare cash to splash!

I personally think it's not a bad signing, at least we'll have some cover at half back for a change!
Onto the Wiki speculation, when he was interviewed after the Warriors/Roosters game at the weekend, I thought he said he was retiring.

Very intelligent signing by Hull. Will give us some real options.

Looks like we are starting to learn at last!

no please take bailey

James Rule due on Radio Humberside anytime now talking about the Thorman signing.

To go all mod on you, put it in the rumour thread... this one is about Thorman.

That is harsh,give the lad a chance 1st Martin.

As for Thorman,dont particulary rate him but if it means the Ginner going and we get another prop in ans are looking for 2010 then it is the right signing...Dykes at 7,Thorman 6 and Horne R...centre?

forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php? ... highlight=

forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php? ... highlight=

Dykes is still here.

That's more like it

For now.

So the "I told you so's" are a bit premature and would make one look very stupid if circumastances change.

Not a bad signing but his defence is questionable
Brough is a better player