Been saying for years Horne isn't creative enough. He used to make up for it by being quick on his feet and making things happen with good footwork but we haven't seen that for the last 2 years.

Which is sooo wrong.....if he doesnt produce - bring in someone who does....he earns a good wage and should do better .....
Why havent we got 2 - 3 young scrum halves at the club learning off Longy too......

He has no creative ability, and as such should never be played in that sort of role. To be honest, neither does Washbrook much, so when both your half backs haven't the kicking or ball handling ability to unlock a defence, then you're on the back foot before you even kick off. If we the fans can see that and have been saying that for at least 2 seasons now, Why can't Agar? Oh, as well as that, Agar plays Horne when he isn't fit

I thought we learnt the lesson a long time ago that Horne is not a seven???

Why not put him at full back and Tansey to seven

People need to take one game at a time and all this if we win by 33 points business was bonkers

Seems that way I'm afraid. As a senior player I had hoped he would maybe become more of an organiser and thinker as he has got older but it hasn't happened. As you say his key weapons of speed and agility appear at least to be fading.

I wish people would stop thinking about putting Horney at fb...:s

Just leave Tansey there

Seems common sense to me, Tansey looks a quality fullback so stop pratting about moving people from there best position just to compensate someone else been crap in their position.

and who do we play at half back, without Horne and Long? Horne can't create at 7, Washbrook can't create at 6 or 7, Agar can't create a gameplan!

OK...we should use Turner then

Totally agree

Moving possibly the only player with the character and ability to lead the team in the absence of Long isn't pratting about in my opinion it's reacting to the obvious issue we have in our team.