Whiting wants to seal the full back spot, was interview on the radio. news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 390251.stm?

Whiting wants to seal the full back spot, was interview on the radio. news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 390251.stm?

Look, feel free to back Cockayne after his court appearance and conviction for serious and violent assault. Then go the extra mile and sponsor him specifically from your own wallet - good for you, and well done for making your position of unconditional patronage crystal clear. Don't try and score some moral highground points on here though because Tansey's had too much ale on more than one occasion and FC are having some difficulties binning him off, which the vast majority on here wish they would/could.

We could talk about his on field record too, Morgan dropped him for the first 6 derbys, he could not hack it.

Too busy getting his teeth into other opponents

totaly agree

A tough one this.........

The lads had 3 warnings, the 1st and definitely the 2nd should have sorted the lad out but here we are potentially being sacked and rightly so.....

However we are very short of cover and I'd hate the club to shoot themselves in the foot by getting rid of a potentially great talent.

Although I'd never buy or even consider reading The Sun, the article Karl posted appeared to point towards some possible comprimise which I'd be happy to see.

If the lad steps out of line after that - then it's instant dismissal.

2 things.
1 I said we should get rid of Ben at the time.
2 I dont have the cash to pay full whack for player sponsorship on my own.
I dont care who it is i'm sponsoring as my only concern is that I help my money goes to my club,The only thing that happens if I don't throw my £10 in is that HKR are £10 poorer.
Now if you want to look deeper then that go right ahead although you would be utterly wasting your time.
Oh and BTW I didn't come on here to troll I actually came on here for a discussion (I know that is a completely alien concept to you but hey ho)

2 things
1) If you think Rovers should have binned Cockayne, why not send Rovers a tenner rather contribute specifically to Cockayne's sponsorhip appeal?
2) What points are you trying to make here? The vast majority think Tansey should be binned, regardless of the crap it leaves us in from a cover perspective. It's not like we want him to stay because he's a handy player so sod the fact he's let the fans and the club down, is it?

No interested love have a row with somebody else.

Cockayne's one time was far worse than anything Tansey has ever done so don't come peddling that card.

Really? You've had a pretty good go on this thread. When it's pointed out that the clear majority of FC fans on here believe the club should get rid of Tansey regardless of the weakening impact on our squad, and that the condemnation of Tansey's actions whilst bankrolling Ben Cockayne post-conviction is a tad inconsistent, you mysteriously slope off. Shame.

I said from day 1 that Ben should have gone.
But we are talking about someone repeat offending aren't we?
It seems i'm getting jumped on for daring to have an oppinion on the subject.
My actual point is that if you DONT let Tansey go it may leave you with problems further down the track, now if i'm trolling as some of you seem to think then surely i'd be advocating him staying wouldn't I?

Doesnt Rich Agar divide people ?

If he tells Rules to sack Tansey he is wrong and if he tells Rule not to sack him,he is also wrong !!!

Tbh I am not interested in Cockayne or Rovers fans opinions on Tansey. Keeping Tansey might not lead to further problems and could end up being a good move, nobody knows!

I want him to have one more shot but I don't think the club will give him it and I can't argue if they do sack him, Tansey has brought this on himself.