Of the 3, I'd rather have Thackray.

Likewise.

Agree. With Cusack, Dowes, Radford, Lauaki definately here though i would rather we keep Moa and Maloney and use those 6.

Moa given the game time for me would become our 2nd impact prop with Lauaki. Cusack, Dowes and Radford to rotate which 2 is in the 17 at any point in time.

I'd keep King think he has been playing well the last three games, i would give him a start next week.

I'd keep Thacks and King before Radford.

we don't have much choice regarding radford though. Thought he did ok at prop on Friday.
Radford, dowes, thackray, lauaki, cusack, king, moa and maloney would do ok IMO.

If that's it for next season, we will certainly be cementing our place in the bottom half of SL.Anyone who could possibly be happy with that group of props has very low expectations for our club next season.

motu tony may well be plying his trade at another SL club next season as interchange hooker/ back up utility player. Doesn't count as non fed trained so anyone in need of a hooker but with no spare places may be very interested

Too much inbalance... 8 props?

The number of them doesn't bother me, it's the quality where the problem lies !!!

Cusack - average workhorse
Dowes - average workhorse
Radford - absolute $hite
King - best days are way way behind him
Thakray - good impact but hit and miss
Lauaki - should be fantastic
Moa - unproven
Maloney - unproven

If that's our idea of dominating the best packs in SL, we are seriously deluded !! The Props for me is the most important department where every good team starts and that group is so far behind most other squads that we will quickly find ourselves with very little to play for again in 2010.

Bloody hell, I agree with you again!

got us good field position on Friday against a big Salford pack.