Saying something over and over again doesn't make it true.

He wasn't trained in England so he's non-fed.

Being non-fed has no impact on eligibility to play for England because the two depend on wholly different criteria.

Those are the facts, like them or not.

I [iget[/i the facts. It's more a pi$$ take that the criteria is different and that the non-fed rule is a joke. You've taken my point way too seriously.

On wigan rumours someone's mentioned Moa to them

Didn't Moa mention that he wouldn't sign for another SL club or am I just imagining that?

The reforming of the tongan mafia, wonder if they'll make a shirt.

The non-fed rule isn't a joke. The joke is Chase playing for England.

No he said that

Let's hope he sticks to his word then, and the only signing he'll be doing is re-signing for Hull!

Surprised that east hull fc fan is wrong again yet still continues to argue the point

This, he's not English, and he's not even that good in a structured side

I agree, but now he does I think it's unfair that they keep him on the list. There should be dispensation to be fair, which would make it even more farcical.

How am I wrong? It's an opinion.
A player that plays for England shouldn't be on a non-fed list. In my opinion, in the future players either get dispensation or they shouldn't be picked in the first place. Do you think it's right?

Yes I do. Why should the place a player first played rugby affect which country he is allowed to play for?

And I know you're now cliaming it's your opinion but you certainly strated out claiming it to be a fact

Why would dispensation be 'fair' exactly? If Chase was to be given dispensation, what if Ben Jeffries was to announce he'd like to be considered for England selection the day after? Would it be 'fair' to grant him similar dispensation from quota status even though there's minimal chance of him getting picked, or 'fair' to reward Castleford for simply signing a better class of foreigner than Wakefield/Bradford have over the last few years?

That's not the argument though, the quota/non-fed system is in place to protect the England side. If we're then going to invite them into the team then what's the point in them being on the lists?

I didn't claim anything as fact.