I don't see a distinction. Unless 14499 is break even.

Any thoughts on what Pearson is aiming/hoping for there?

Didn't Hudgell say this time last year that 10k crowds wee needed to break even,hence the urgency for ground re-development?

No 8k isnt success when 10000 is needed.

Remind me was it 2010 when the 14k capacity Poorhouse Lane would be open?

As for cabinet full of trophies,

er,

our last one is from 2005.

Your last major one was, er.

hmmm

Ridding the club of the current mill stone is a start

I quite like playing with numbers - I was just wondering what people might think would be a desirable and realistic alternative arrangement. There may be algebra later - be warned.

surely (I could be wrong I'm not an accountant.) but with a 300k debt you would ony break even again once that debt is cleared and the balance sheet reads 0 and to do this you must generate more income than what goes out. So if AP says we need to be at 14500 to balance the books then 14500 will bring in the revenue needed to clear the debt and balance the books. Well thats how I read it anway. Feel free to put me right but I really couldn't give $hite. A challenge cup win and a grand final apperance and everyones a winner.

the large tax bill that has been mentioned - i know AP has said we have reached an agreement with ours but are any other superleague clubs about to be faced with a similar bill, and as it relates to overseas players are some clubs (those who, you know, have one or two more than other clubs) about to get hit with a big bill?

in the article AP states that if match day revenues don't increase you will continue to trade at a loss which he will have to fund personally, that to me suggests it's real money he is talking about you losing rather than any "creative accounting " about the "value " of your players that Kath and her cronies had on your balance sheets, so yes you might be wrong there.