How about the [itonking[/i though?

Agree team performance wise, thought Johnstone was decent, brown good for his try, thought Fash was our best forward, followed by cator and lane

While Houghton didn't do anything wrong I thought he just looked better and quicker without him. Johnstone gets the ball away quicker.
Solid performance all round with Cator the pick of the bunch for me.

great first half, enthusiasm and some great plays put is in complete control, losing sneyd i expected us to struggle second half but defensive effort combined with poor play by hudds calmed any nerves

Think our goal line defence is a worry to be honest, Huddersfield poor, we kept them out our 10 most of the game, the couple of opportunities hudds had, scored pretty easily

bit harsh, both plays were top draw...especially their first try where edwards ran the angle allowing Goulding to ghost through...if that was one of out tries we'd all be raving about it

Cator certainly took his chance today - not sure whether we class him as "Club Hull" but he looks like he has an affinity with the club.

Considering we’d had very little defence to do, thought our effort was poor for both

your opinion, but thought both were well worked

Some of the comments on here after that game are mystifying. Salford debacle, Covid lockdown, 5 first team missing, and Huddersfield showing up well in previous games FC tonked em good and proper, ffs, what do some of you so called fans want. Seb, you were soooooo wrong this time, eat humble pie.

FC’s defence caused there problems. Get with the programme

Huddersfield bombed a lot of chances by dropping the ball in good field position in the second half.
They also saw very little of the ball in the first half due to many ruck infringements.
Two points is a boost to confidence but it could have been much closer had Hudds converted some of their second half chances

If we had converted some of our second half chances it could have been much more than a four score winning margin.

4.35205078125:5