Think how good they'd have been under a decent coach

You do, you just won't admit it to yourself

Will you change your routine when Bobby Davro does ?

So?

Murdoch has a point, players have improved during his tenure. How much of this improvement is directly through Agar's input we will never know. Many of the young improved players, will be becoming more tactically aware, maturing and vitally gaining experience. If there is no improvement as a result of this, then they are clearly not cut out to be super league players.

Where Agar got so much wrong, is his lack of gameplan, unable to change a gameplan during the match when it is clear things are not working, his poor tactical decisions, use of subs (baffling on numerous occasions) we have become predictable the list goes on.

Bye Mr Agar thanks for your efforts, but you were not quite up to the job

After listening to it on iPlayer, I would hope that Murdoch does the same tomorrow and then returns to apologise for some of the most sycophantic twaddle I've heard in years.

The bloke would suck one a mile long

davro's an amateur, les dennis is da man

It's got nothing to do with whether I agree or not with Murdoch as I put in a previous post some points he makes are valid but an awful lot of what he has said recently and the way he has come across have being cringeworthy. Agar got some things right and some wrong he hasn't been a success and it's his results over 4 years that have cost him not the fans. He has also been quite aggressive to any caller, texter or emailer if they questioned Agars ability as a head coach. Tonight he came across IMHO as a aggressive & condescending & wouldn't accept another views other than his own.

a bit like an audio RLFANS then.

Amongst Murdock's tweets tonight was the comment that Agar had little money for players. What, apart from £100k plus fee for Westerman, you mean? He's convinced that our next coach will reap success off the back of what Agar's done.