Seymour is still getting paid by hull so he should play, even if want rid Seymour will either getter paid off or sign for someone else so he won't lose out.

If Seymour doesn't play we have no chance of winning tomorrow.

There was no outburst.

Seymour's a pro rugby league player, and still being paid by us, needs a serious slap if he thinks he can get away with refusing to play

Do we know that is the case or are we speculating on here for a change

I think your dummy landed over there.

Too true...i think Pearson is implying we aren't getting value for money from some players and the contracts they are on (maybe Seymour is one of them), it does appear that previous salary cap spend hasn't been utilised in the most efficient way?

Hopefully its just derby week speculation

Surely it is not in any player's interest to refuse to play, if he did it would be a breach of contract and play into the hands of a club that wanted to terminate that contract. I am sure that Seymour and Hull FC will have something sorted if he no longer fits in with our plans.

bit O/T but erm, after all the Cas fans were saying how great Jamie Ellis is after just one game against Huddersfield (who have lost at home to Wakefield)
latest score is

Castleford 10 - 34 Warrington
(h/t 0 - 30)

Hudds also got well beat by Wakey 35-10.

Dont care what mrs brough , brother or anyone else says I know for fact pearson n mccrae met brough and his agent in york last tues . Dont know if a deal was struck but they have talked .

Hudds also got well beat by Wakey 35-10.

Cas come back! 26-34!