Not a chance will we see them moved from were they are playing.

I'd like to see Tansey groomed to be our long-term 7, has all the attributes to play there.

In an ideal world, Tomkins.

Realistically, I'm one of those on here who think Ratchford may be worth a look.

whitings been with us years and has little game time at 6 so it doesnt matter what we signed him as.

its very different getting the ball at first receiver than second or third.

I feel the longer he plays at 1, till the end of 2012 id presume, he will iron out his deficiencies in his game then the move to 7 would be more improbable.

Paul Cooke anyone?

Holdsworth's a decent player though, and his experience is more crucial to Salford at present I think. Also, most half backs are defensively suspect when they first emerge, he may yet improve that area of his game. The most important thing is whether or not he has the raw attributes necessary, the rest can potentially be taught. I'm not saying he's the real deal or anything, just worth keeping an eye on.

the Salford fans are saying ratchford will be played at fb next season, with smith set to follow holdsworth in signing a new deal.

Richard Horne is the answer at 6 providing he can get fit imo.

I'd take Ratchford happily. Horne needs to prove himself for the rest of this season. He needs a run in the side to prove he has the ability and that he is not too injury prone for the salary that he currently commands.

Large chunk of Hornes salary isnt on the cap now he's been here 10 years.

This season yes, but it reverts back to full salary next season doesn't it?