It was lost by foster and never touched Horne's hands so our srum or advantage a TRY

Rubbish, of course he touched it.

I suggest you watch it again not with his hand ,Foster lost it so knock on by him .
Our scrum.

the way i saw it was Foster was in the act of catching the ball and Horne knocked it from his grasp,right decision for mine. The washbrook one i think he got wrong,he went to catch the ball,not tackle the player,he had as much right to penalise the saints player as washbrook.

The ball WAS in contact with Foster's hand when Horne knocked it on so the decision was right.

You lot need to stop clutching at straws.

I've watched it plenty of times thanks.

So you are saying that Horne didn't even touch the ball? How exactly did the ball suddely change direction then?

Sorry Besty watched it a few times now and Foster never had control of the ball and the ball was away from his hand before Horne touched it.

Totally agree with the Washbrook one he had his on the ball all the time...

Regardless of what people think about the knock on, that decision was Thaler's so Ganson can't be blamed.

Saints had two fine passes given as forward, Meli's and Roby's.

Foster clearly knocks on as does Horne, should've been Hull ball.

As for the penalty, crazy decision. Washbrook's arms indicate that without a doubt he was challenging for the ball.

And if you listen clearly a point made by Ganson himself too the Hull players