Nice edit

I do think, yes its my own brain, im able to form an opinion.

The only difference between 1999 and 2011 is 5000 fans and 5 league places. Reckon our debts were a similar level to boot

And this is nowt to do with Richo, the moment he and Bomber left was when it all went very very wrong

Not to much exageration and bitterness in there, (and out of interest, who do you think Mrs H's Son in Law is?).

For the dim of thinking, the above comment doesn't men I am backing or defending Rule/Kath or the previous board.

Yes Fact. I don't sign up to this forum balls of putting fact on everything I say, however I've seen it with my own eyes, so yes it's fact.

I've been an FC fan for over 25 years so have an affinity with the club but I know for sure, like Glees has said, it goes on and a number of players could have tested positive. I bet you if the UKAD tested every player from all clubs in one go, they'd have to cancel a few games for lack of registered players.

Don't even go there, please.

Chris

1 the previous year, but thats not really important
2 ??
3 ??
4 ITS THERE JOB TO BE AWARE

Nicotine is currently on the monitoring lists, if this is banned then god help us

Good point, certain drugs can only be detected within days or even hours

Further "comment" on Twitter. No idea what they're on about, though :

@LeagueFreak
League Freak
It's about time the RFL put the blowtorch to Wigan and find out what happened with Gleesons "Release". #RugbyLeague #SuperLeague

replies ↓

@LeagueFreak Wigan have got a lot to answer for in this whole mess. If the whole truth comes out they're basically ****ed.

it's a farce if you ask me, just read the inside sport piece and theres gotta be more to it than his time at Hull????!!!!!

and still no comment from the dentist man.

Gleeson's been threatening legal action hasn't he? If the claims about documentary evidence are true he could have a very strong case.

Do you even remember that far back? Lloyd was about to close the club - that's the main difference. Nobody is claiming that Kath and co did anything out of a sense of altruism, but the fact is that before the merger we were about to vanish into thin air. In no way, shape, or form are we in a worse state now.

Legal action against whom?

Any case he might bring against any of the parties involved would be long, complicated, expensive, and far from certain to succeed. At the end of the day he's facing the simple fact that ultimate responsibility for taking a banned substance lies with the player, so all he could look at would be trying to prove that he'd have got a lesser ban if he'd been honest from the start. And according to the UKAD report that simply isn't the case.

It's been said he has spoken to Max Clifford over all this,and he's like a little terrier,doesn't give in

Sadly i do, i'm not a "new fan"

I remember all about the saving of us, but lets be honest, kath came here due to cicumstances, rather than choice.

TBH i should have put 2001/2 (when Richo left) instead of 1999

Gleeson now has no career left & nothing to lose. His word vs someone else's wouldn't stand up in court, but supporting documentation can only strengthen his position. If he was going to go quietly we wouldn't have read todays story would we?

Firstly I'd like TO THANK Mr Rule for attempting to protect our Club and players.

Secondly, Gleeson and Long potentially libelous comment removed - Kosh consistantly prove to us what a pair of losers they BOTH ARE (Just read LONG's tweets )

We as a CLUB have obviously been stupid, careless, un - professional and REALLY UNLUCKY.

WE WILL UNITE......WE WILL LOCK EVERYTHING DOWN....WE WILL COME OUT STRONGER.

We only lose when were cheating, lose when were cheating........