Can't agree. Can you imagine DDD being allowed to chair a Rovers forum? Why should their fans have to put up with that?

If Humberside had organised and funded the forum and Hull were therefore indebted to them, then I can see an argument to let them dictate who chairs. But as this has been organised and funded by the club and FC Voices, then they should decide who chairs, and it should be someone who empathizes with the feelings of the fans.

I'm not interested in what the presenter says, just the panel.

I believe the club should ask RH to organise and produce the next forum.

I'd like to think we've moved on from the poor relationship of recent years.

Has this sold out yet? I haven't got my ticket yet!

Aye. One wouldn't want him chairing our Forum either.

But the presenter dictates the tone and mood of the session and contributes a good percentage of the questions. I for one am not interested in Gollum's choice of questions or in listening to his patronizing sycophancy to the panel, while all the time we know full well he doesn't mean a word of it as he gives not two hoots about our club.

This outrage by Gollum is purely because because he feels slighted, it's a blow to his massive ego and he seems to under some illusion that the title "Rugby League editor of the local radio station" earns him some kind of automatic status and rights within the city. It doesn't. And wouldn't even if he was impartial.

Is James Clark impartial though?

I'm not sticking up for Radio Humberside here, by the way. I just want the best for Hull FC and that includes a beneficial relationship with all local media.

What has gollum actually said?

club shop has sold out, a colleague from work picked the last two up today, not sure about the saville street shop though

Of course he is. he hosted airlie night with rule didn't he?

hear the facts not the rumours.