I can't get a copy of the paper, and it doesn't seem the article appears online.....?

While the £500 seems like a victory, as others have mentioned it sets a dangerous precedent. Once we have accepted the principle of a charge for displaying pictures/memorabilia then there is nothing to stop that charge being increased - or indeed other similar charges being levied.

Hopefully the club and the council are aware of this and will act accordingly.

Where has this £500 figure come from? How have they gotten to that value? What does it entail? (Is it just match days? Equal wall space? Number if photos, etc?)

I'd be very wary. To me it feels like they just want us to accept that the terms of the contract have changed by accepting a low figure. They can then charge us what the hell they like after a while.

Personally, I'd tell them to ram it. It shouldn't cost anything. We shouldn't leave ourselves open on this one.

Agree 100%, and I honestly believe the club will say the same.

BOOM!!!!

We have a winner. Once a single penny changes hands it changes the legal position. On the twitter feed, Allam has posted its the principal that matters. Yet he fails to see it is him that has changed the original position. At the end of the day, he is not daft and he will want to engineer a situation where by he wins in the long run.

Time will tell

I find the offer from the SMC , insulting and a disgrace., £500 for having FC pictures on display for match days only- that equates to 13 home games ie £38.46 per gameday or permanently £14,000 per annum.

We should not pay any payment whatsoever. -as we would be allowing SMC to invoice us anything they desire.

I would urge, ALL FC fans in any future local elections, to think very carefully before they vote, anything but a vote for Labour,would make us homeless - IMO.

Paying the money will set a very dangerous precedent imo, that figure of £500 will rise dramatically and where will the charges stop? Before you know it Assem Trotter and his little side kick will be charging exorbitant amounts for everything FC do at the KC. Common sense and a pair of nuts needs to be adopted by the council to take these little minded throw my rattle out the pram merchants to task. Why should the pictures etc even warrant taking down or charging for them being there? They say its commercial space but not for city and fc being there what other use in realistic terms does the stadium get used for and do they really expect any other businesses to pay for that space in the foyer or the suites walls? How the hell these mercenaries stay in business with the childish attitude they have absolutely amazes me tbh. They have seriously underestimated the passion of rugby fans in this city if they think they can merely brush aside the games history without a whim from us the fans.

I really hope the Council are taking note of the Allams continuously stating they are propping up the SMC financially when it was actually their arrival that signified the start of the negative balance sheet.

That's it then, we fight on until no charge is involved.

And a public apology, to JW, on the pitch, on Sky from Dr Weasel!

It is on Line on the HDM site in the news section no doubt now doctored

Absolutely right 100%, give them nothing but a kick up the harris! Allems

The £500 is only for Johnny Whitely pictures, if we want to put up other pictures we will have to pay more

so, it's £500 for Whiteleys picture alone, and only on match days.

KEEP THE PRESSURE ON THE IDIOTS

So the £500 only relates to the JW pictures, so any other Hull FC pictures would still be chargeable.

The fact is the walls at the KC Stadium should be adorned mutually in all public areas of the Stadium with pictures and memorabilia of not only City & FC but also sporting clubs & sports people from Hull as a show to people visting the stadium the sporting history and tradition of the City, not used or charged as bilboards.