"2 fairly simple missed goals cost us" = "Our goal kicker missed 2 fairly simple goals which cost us" = "Hall missed 2 fairly simple goals which cost us"

I was merely pointing out what you said is essentially the same thing...



No mention of "several reasons" or "different factors" there. How did Craig feel about it at the time?

Hall should defo be in the starting 13 this week imo. We've missed somebody with abit of punch in attack, and no disrespect to celtic, but I think Hall could tear them to pieces out wide. G.Horne on the other hand, offers absolutely nothing at centre, (and never has) he's not even a solid defender any more, you only have to look at his attempted 'tackle' on matt king at wire a few weeks back, and how senior completely owned him last week, to realise that. Hall never did anything wrong to be dropped in the first place, he was thrown in at full back (were he actually did well) and as soon as he started to make errors, it was bye bye into the reserves. If we treated all of our players like this, they would all be in the reserves as everybody makes mistakes, however it seems Hall is made the scapegoat more often that not. He has been unfairly treated at FC, and I for one wouldnt blame him if he decided to move elsewhere (even KR).

Hall should replace the worst starting centre on Friday (yes, I am of the opinion that G.Horne is worse at centre than Littler!) and Whiting should replace Thorman at 6. But we know it won't happen

I thought by "In fact I think he was asked if the missed kicks cost them and he agreed..." you actually knew what you were on about and not talking complete . My mistake.

So please point out where I quoted him? In part of the press conference when he was asked to sum up the game he stated that poor defence and execution of plays etc etc were the reason we lost. He was then asked if the missed kicks were a factor to which he agreed. All of which someone means he put all the blame for the loss on Craig Hall.

Speaking of complete rubbish.......

Again, I'll refer you to your original post that I was replying toIn fact I think he was asked if the missed kicks cost them and he agreed that as we missed 4 from 6 (at least 2 of which were fairly simple) that they had cost us. He certainly didn't say anything like "Hall cost us the game".

That would suggest you knew what Sharp said, albeit without quoting him directly. I do remember at the time hearing that Craig (and his father) weren't best pleased with what was said after that game by Sharp.

Bloody boo hoo......Sharps qoutes were taken out of context by the mediawe outscored them try wise and didnt kick the goals...some of which were kickable.

So what you trying to say??

Jesus Wept!! You are obvioulsy incapable of following the flow of thread so I will condense it down for....deep breath....here we go......

The first comment was....



Kosh rightly pointed out that....



Mr Gekko here thought he would try to have a further dig (imagine that)



To which I pointed out that what my recollection of the events was.....




To which you somehow came to the below conclusion