Yer you might be right there, maybe we aren't saving enough to finance buying Westerman and Obst without dipping into some of the profits, not to the degree I thought you were implying though. It wasn't really an accusation anyway, the club said Westerman was being bought using profits before Berrigan and Tansey left so I always assumed that claim was null and void now.

You mean like last week when you were posting up the SL site penalty stats and using them to claim that our discipline was on a par with Wigan's? You even went so far as to claim that in the 2009 season we had the best discipline in the league. If you're not doing something as foolish as that you're just wittering on about injuries. I own you every time you attempt it mate, it's a waste of time for us both.

Indeed I did claim that in 2009 we had the best discipline (as far as penatlies went) in the league after your statement that under Agar we had no discipline.

rlhttp://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_club.php?season

As you say a nice bit of "ownership" on your part. But as I said then dont let your rather worrying obsession with Rich Agar get in the way of facts.

And unless you re-write history Agar has had more than his fare share of injuries under his regime. But as I said at the very beginning I would give Agar 8 or 9 games this season to "turn things round" with a full squad. Sadly at the moment I dosent looks like he will. But if and when he goes my thoughts wont be based on his accent or how "thick" he is.

your life (vertual one) seems to be surrounded by your wish to "own" everyone...
if you used as much energy supporting the club as you do sitting on your pc in your underpants everyday it would be far more productive you know... i know you think that Kath reads your posts particularly however ............... she doesnt mate!!!

you just bit your tounge didnt you

When you are repeatedly stating that our low penalty count during the disastrous 2009 season is evidence that Agar had instilled a high degree of discipline into the team then there really isn't anything else that needs saying.

Aw bless

I'm pretty sure that rule confirmed last year that the directors loans had been repaid.

Now, I'm no accountant, but presumably a reduction in debt must be brought about by money so does the reduction in debt equate roughly to our profitability over the last 5 years?

www.thisishullandeastriding.co.u ... ticle.html Read the comments - better than this board as no MODS on daily wail

www.thisishullandeastriding.co.u ... ticle.html Read the comments - better than this board as no MODS on daily wail

Wouldn't really matter, the loan repayments would be an agreed amount as an expense of the business. Why would Kath use her rightful share of profits to reduce her own personal asset?