Well anyhow, good on you for trying defend them.

maybe edged it but not for 75 mins..... I think not, we know it and you know it I don;t expect you to admit it though.

Where did I do that? I simply stated they may not have known it was him and even then I said they shouldn't be doing it for any player, apart from Cooke of course

I find it funny how there explaining "Rugby" to us, we played badly and still won bla bla.

They've done nothing in this league to even be that patronising.

If we had been on top for 75 minutes of the game we would have won. All games have changes of momentum and Saturday was no different, however, over the course of the game we were the better team IMO.

If they reach the play-off Semi that would be a brilliant achievement for them IMO. Its more likely, however, that they will possibly win 1 game in the play-offs.

If you read my original reply I think I said pretty much that, what i was stating was hudds will be a different prospect and edging out us in that form will no way be good enough to get close to hudds.

I'm not so sure, they seem to have a happy to be there mentality.

2 years ago?? you mean 2007 when we met you in the play offs? hardly a game where you could say you was going to beat us by lots of points!

anyway see you fri night, should be a good game... hope thorman plays

I have a little faith in Hull,even considering the season we have had.After all we have already beaten them this season so why not again?.It's a funny old game this rugby lark.

You raised your game for your cup final and it still wasn't good enough, nothing to get to excited over

]

Wembley was last year wasnt it?

Yes and now its us, progress of the highest order