Who ever posted that was misguided. But its hardly a suprise that a companies customers is the main sourse of its turnover.

I think the point was, as individuals each customer alone provides a very small amount, where as a sponsor / sky would provide a large amount, as an individual contributor.

Try telling that to paul duffen

you really are a jake, or is your username just spelt wrong?

Are you still pretending you have inside info on the club that you can't divulge or tell us who it came from?

His inside knowledge is of kath Hetherington

Nope. I [iquestioned[/i whether they do. There is a difference.


Nope. You've come up with some estimated figures that indicate that they [imight[/i. That's not proof.

Not you as well!

As it happens I reckon you're not far off, and the split on gross turnover is somewhere around 60/40 in favour of the fans. Profitability will favour the other income streams, though - especially when you consider that we don't get 100% of large gates.

From Duffens point of view, for this season he is probably right with regard to Hull City. They will get far more through the TV companies than via the paying punter.

Never "pretended", but carry on.

You should change your username to The Great Pretender. You've been sussed

Sorry but that is quite possibly the worst comeback I've read on here