Exactly how I see it. There's a reason that the worst team in SL didn't renew his contract and that he was sat around kicking his heels when we gave him a chance. He will be badly found out when we play a team who start to kick the ball high to him or in behind him near the line

I've not seen anyone belittling the performance anywhere. Who is?

Huddersfield was just as low in confidence as much as FC was..we responded better & got on the front foot better through our pack digging in...so anyone saying we beat a poor side is talking rubbish...remember this is the team that embarrassed us not so long ago & imo they've strengthened if out...so fair play to our lads for not letting them in the game even with the man of steel!

]
Fook me, if that's your idea of belittling you should stay away from these boards when we lose

Belittle to consider or speak of (something) as less valuable or important than it really is; disparage'"

Rubbish is a pretty big call against someone who goes into a super league game and apart from one defensive fail holds their own. A stop gap for sure but rubbish is too strong imo.

We all have opinions I guess. Fact is he was considered not good enough for london and no one else wanted him. He offers no attacking threat whatsoever and is shaky under the high ball (in fact he hides when they come his way)

We let 1 try in which isn't bad in 80 mins of rugby..out wide aswell...we should be more then happy..he makes good yards going forward your talking bull smack mate!

People can try and convince themselves that colborn is a decent winger all they want but they'll realise at some point that he's way below the standard we need

If we had a full fit squad he prob wouldn't be in but its not an ideal world is it bud?

Well, compared to your vast RL knowledge which you keep reminding everyone of, you're probably right.

Probably? I'd hope your mate has more sense than that. Just had a look at colborn's stats. he's attempted 26 tackles this year and missed 11 of them (58% success). talanoa has attempted 31 and missed 3 (90% success). The much maligned ben crooks has missed 19 of the 130 he's attempted (85% success)and arundel has missed 1 of 30 (975 success). Add in colborn being really poor under the high ball and his sluggishness and I stick by my opinion of him. By far the weakest experienced player in the squad. He's not bad at bringing the ball back but you always know it's just a case of him driving it in whereas with the other wingers look like they will break tackles once in a while

I know enough to see that huddersfield were below par last night but if you want to convince yourself otherwise knock yourself out.