I guess not then !!!

If im barking up the wrong tree here please accept my apologies but if your suggesting Berro is on that kind of money every year, you are very much mistaken !!

Oh sorry pal, well I thought Dave K did a good enough job for me and it didn't need any more input from me.

And hence the wink lol

Im just interested in what these other departments are that Hall is superior in thats all. Unless the odd break that Dave K mentions is the only department you meant ?

Yes you do. Your claim he played more than 95% of games at FC at hooker is clearly bollox, and he was player of the year in 2008. Pick on someone else. Like David Mills, who's played 4 SL games from a possible 33 since he signed a new 2 year deal at Rovers.

I am not interested in the point of this argument but to say we should not give a wing spot to a young inexperienced player without a single SL game is' plain silly' by you - Every-one has to start some-where some start quicker than others - Just one example Clive Sullivan - 3 tries on Debut - never looked back. The difference being Clive was a winger - nothing else. Welcome aboard Denis Tuffour. Far be it for me to live in the past but I am sure lots of other people can come up with examples

Take £100k a year off and you may be very close

Sully wasn't a regular for three years or so after his debut, though, for various reasons.

totally and absolutely barking!!!

Shows just what you don't know really! Berro's is on just over half of that! Oh and I have had a quick look through my Diary and he has as far as I can see started 8 games away from the hooking position since he arrived. So either talk sense or forget it!

I appreciate what you say but he was only ever a winger as is Calderwood - some of the young lads we have - Briscoe - Hall - etc will move to other places (Hall already so) Although I dont know a lot about Reece Lynn and Denis it would seem at the moment they would be wingers- I may be proved wrong of course.
Some daft coach once played R Horne on the wing for GB - strange thing is it did not help his course at all.

I can't see it being as low as that TBH. [url=http://www.slstats.org/p1678/Shaun+Berrigan+.htmlHere[/url has it as 18 in the league alone, which I can well believe.

I've always been of the opinion that he is quality player who has not been afforded the opportunity to show his worth in his time here. When we have played well and laid the platform he needs, he's usually been at the thick of things.

On the 'number of games Berrigan's had at hooker' issue, of his 49 SL games for us, he's [url=http://www.rugbyleagueproject.org/matches/Custom/NDEtLTktLS0tLS0xMDktLS0tLS0tLS0=apparently[/url started 27 at hooker. 55%. So not quite the 95% that was claimed.