Does this mean Agar as seen sense and will now play Radford at prop, where he belongs. Freeing up space for a proper loose forward in the team?

I remember a fans meet the players night at Boulevard (yes, meet the players, free entry) I think it was 2001 Richo was there, he stated the wage bill was at around £1.4 million. (this was the season we brought in Richie Barnett x 2 i remeber the "dicks in the team" joke aimed at them, Swain and Fletcher)

He actually stated that the following season the wage bill would be less!

Now as has been mentioned elsewhere on this board look at the wonderfull talent we had at the club, we scored points for fun, McCrae was actually doing a good job with our youth, rather than sacking them off to the NL1

That was with a playing salary cap of less than £1.4 miilion.

Richo did say how the staduim would allow us to operate at the cap max and would give us an even better team!

ooooooookkkkkkaaaaayyyy, you go on what you think you know I'll wait and see! Although rule said on KCFM a while back that because "were at full cap, until the crocker situation sorts itself out our hands are tied".
Now do you think crocker was going to be on between 4-500k?

about £700k i reckon

Manu
Burnett
Tickle

But out of them only O'meley, Lauaki and Moa offer any kind of go forward.


We have a 'proper loose forward' in Danny Washbrook.
Radford shouldn't be in the squad, let alone playing at prop.

3 of them are 150k+, granted only one of those I know for certain, the other 2 are what has been reported.

They will only be 1 here at present on 150k plus

berro?

i was thinking more Thorman

oh yes you could be right

On the face of it the decision does not make sense but then again we don't have a clue why this has been done or why he has not been given more of a chance after initially impressing. Agar gave him bigs raps during the off season yet he has hardly figured, so there must be a reason why.

Either way we could need him due to our shortage of props.

Sooooo.....

...Maloney!