Also not only signing Pryce, but getting him early was Mylers work.


No CEO is the world gets every signing right.


If we keep Knight great, but if we don't I trust them to get the right player.

I like Knight, he is a solid prop, and he has gone well. But, he isn't worth getting into a bidding war for, or releasing other quota players (if we can't get Bell dispensation). With his relationship with a woman in the media in Australia, he is going to be here, for whatever club he plays for, on his own, and those players tend not to complete contracts, and get homesick pretty quickly. Not saying Knight would be like that, but typically it happens. He has a succesful business away from Rugby too, so it isnt like he needs to play - he openly admitted he nearly retired

My view on Knight is that, yes he has probably been overhyped by some people who seem to be hailing him as a superstar, but he's still a very good player who has fitted in really well. He's our second best prop, and he would get into every other teams 17 imo. So whilst he's not irreplaceable, why would you want to replace him if you don't need to? He's proven he is good enough, he seems to have fitted in well and is enjoying himself, he seemingly has the professionalism and the character traits that Cartwright looks for. The only sticking point is the quota. If that gets resolved next week, it's a no brainer to keep him imo. 

If Warrington come in and offer him silly money then that's a different debate, but I don't see how they can afford to. He's not marquee standard, so how much more can they really manage to throw at him?

As others call him on here Richie Rich Myler take a bow. Remember certain posters continually slagging and questioning his decisions. Bit like them slagging of Briscoe Seizer Cust etc when we signed them  Slowest back line in SL history.etc. ? 

As for Knight I trust in what Cartwright sees in him. Certainly on the field him and Ese work well in tandem. I'd like to see him stop. 

Another British player struggling to find form in the NRL. That will spark a lot of interest and I'd expect Hull to be at least curious under the new regime. https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/dom-young-dropped-from-sydney-roosters-squad

Another British player struggling to find form in the NRL. That will spark a lot of interest and I'd expect Hull to be at least curious under the new regime. https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/dom-young-dropped-from-sydney-roosters-squad

I would take Young, as I actually think Barron could make a pretty good centre

They'd be 7 or 8 clubs after him if he were to leave the NRL , And walk into all of them . He'd be a great addition to any team .

Would require a hugh salary, I don't think he is worth it, still think he might get an NRL deal based on his Newcastle firm.

Is on over 250k a year at the moment.


No way I'd pay 200k plus for a winger in SL.

Big call this, but I'd rather keep Ashworth than Knight, we need a quota spot for Knight and we don't have one.


If the rules change for Bell we could sign a outside back to replace Briscoe and still have a option to keep Sao.

Would say keeping Ashworth should be a priority, if it isnt already sorted. Other than a couple of dumb penalties (in which he hasnt been alone) for me hes been very good value this season, also think his attitude towards the club etc has been great and the added fact he made the move to live here too when he signed. Think we'd struggle to find a replacement.