Regardless of Hall's deficiencies - and I agree with your point about his lack of consistency - I think some people would just rather have him playing and behaving on and off the field when compared to the current incumbent at full back. Says more about Tansey than Hall really.

I agree wholeheartedly that we should have rid of Tansey if he's proving to be a disruptive influence. I even agree that Hall should keep his place this season if Tansey has behaved in a manner that warrants his exclusion from the side. What I don't agree with is the notion that we should keep Hall if we get rid of Tansey (or even if we don't). He's had enough chances, we have plenty of options at centre (he's not a full back), and I don't think he's the sort of player that will take us to the next level.

Agreed. If Tansey goes it does not mean Hall should stay. Hall is not and never will be a full back.

Hint at it from Danny? Sounds like Tansey is the only one not buying it in.

It's interesting that Danny would say this as we all know how he and Thacks alledgedly used to be. It seems like Thacks going and a word in the ear by Rich or one of the new players has done Ticks the world of good.

You'd think that wouldn't you

Maybe we should have hung on to Shaun Briscoe after all.

Well a member of staff has left the building for the last time today !!

pm'd Mrs !!