My God - are you being:

a) - deliberately obtuse;
b) - thick or
c) - illiterate?

Or perhaps you're just empathizing with Cooke's ability to comply with:

a) - the first statement in your signature and
b) - not the second.

One post from me. Relating to an inflammatory worded question Paul Cooke (ex-player and now self-proclaimed neutral commentator on both Hull teams in the Mail) made in an attempt to undermine Gentle's judgement.

Why is that not relevant [itoday[/i as it was published [itoday[/i in an RL journal?

You're right. Paul Cooke isn't relevant today to Hull FC. He just thinks he is.

Or perhaps hopes he is.

People are obsessed. But he was still talking e

And, it appears, you.

How many tweets did you exchange?

You've taken it far too seriously.

No, dear. I was never serious in the first place. [iYou[/i just said I was.

You [iare[/i funny. I repeated a singular tweet from a popular RL paper which they printed because they thought, as I did, it was ironic.

You clearly thought the same, as you wouldn't have tweeted him back. So you did "post" - to Cooke on Twitter - as soon as you saw it, yes.

Deary me. Perhaps you'll post my thoughts onto him, as you're the important one with the contacts.

Ta.

Well this is