Anybody thats played before will know what I mean when I say you can tell where peoples heads are when your being tackled.
Elbowing it once could be seen as an accident, but several times is a clear way of trying to hurt an opposition player.

Exactly. I also made reference to the fact in an earlier thread that Radford would not have been able to tell whether it was a fist or an elbow, for all he knew it was Bailey attacking [ihim[/i.

Spot on..
ANother porter made the point once the elbow makes contact once anyone would realise it so why did he feel the need to do it several times more?...this proves the intention imo. Added to the fact the animal then decided to try and head butt longy with intention I can't understand why people can say he done nothing wrong..
Radders should publicly offer him to a boxing match ( for charity of course ) to give him the good pasting he deserves... for a good cause obviously

rob burroughs is baileys minder.

so back to the thread, has he been charged with anything?

No he hasn't. Suprise suprise. (according to The Gaurdian)

If not, it's an utter disgrace. Does the fact that his attempted head-butt didn't connect make him less guilty? The intent was very clearly there and the disciplinary panel should be ashamed of themselves if they take no action.

Use of forearm in 10th minute (Radford)
Decision No charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Player attempts to regain feet and play the ball, forearm makes unintentional contact with opponent, provokes opponent but no misconduct

It make unintentional contact 4 times

It's laughable

gets a bit edgy when people are behind him, had that for the last 6 or so years

Bailey must have relatives in the RFL.

If the whole incident went on report, why is the headbutt part ignored? I know he never made contact but the intention was there for all to see. If Long had been any closer it would have been interesting to see what happened. All in brawl would be my guess, but hey, it never connected so all is well