unlike your set of props who were part of the 'best' pack in superleague last season according to your staff!

He is only a decent prop, don't go all ott about him cause he wants to join you lot.

Poore was only a decent prop and you got your socks out.

Poore was only a decent prop, no arguments from me there, Amor was the star prop who left Wakefield.

I think that as has been said by a previous first time poster who seems to have a bit of insider knowledge, all the signs indicate that he has already signed a very lucrative deal to join us in 2016. However to get it cleared up it would be a good question to ask Adam Pearson at the next fans forum a week on Tuesday.

How can he have signed a deal with us when we can't even speak to him until middle of next season? Any contract he has signed would be unenforceable anyway if he changes his mind

Rupes is brilliant, didn't post on here the last few games of the season and not until they signed a few players, wonder why?

The fact that Wigan fans are very disappointed that he isn't staying says it all.

You're absolutely right about this. Wigan have nothing against Hull but, in this case, there's no way we can let him come to you on loan. That would be like saying ''we want a fee or him (having paid one for his services) but, as Hull are unwilling to pay one we'll let him go for free instead!'' I'm sure your club would take a similar stance in similar circumstances. As for the difference to other players we have let go; in general it is the intention of those payers to return, as Joel Tomkins did recently and Sam Tomkins and Mossop (injury situation notwithstanding!) are strongly rumoured to be doing too. That isn't the case with Taylor.

And we got transfer fees for all those players.

Absolutely Rogues! And rather large ones at that!

Scott has signed for Salford on a year long deal. He will be in a Hull shirt from 2016 on a 4/5 year deal.

Wigan go as near as they can at present to explaining the situation here without Hull making a statement about the fact that he has already signed for us for 2016. www.newsnow.co.uk/A/743947692?-4338:2393

Wigan go as near as they can at present to explaining the situation here without Hull making a statement about the fact that he has already signed for us for 2016. www.newsnow.co.uk/A/743947692?-4338:2393

So Salford will have little if any "ownership" of Taylor during or at the end of the loan period.

Maybe Salford are allowing him to commute a much longer distance than other clubs were prepared to do.

No-one forced Salford to pay a fee so one assumes they are happy with the one year deal as is Taylor.

Koucash and Pearson may even have discussed the arrangement.