At least he's consistent; making up the rules as he goes along, for me [ithat[/i tackle on the Warrington player was incomplete and it was Craig Halls shoulder tackle that he penalised.
I also thought the try in the corner was at the least dodgy.

Funniest thread I have seen for a long time. As if your team were whiter than white? Your lot were not up to it, you lost, forget all this boring drivel and move on!

You have rather a strange sense of humour then.

You obviously haven't been on ere B4 we have had some far funnier than this......but Ganson is always good for a laugh>

Think the word you are looking for is a bradawl....oo no sorry thought you said boring driver.....see...funny....hahahahaha

Yes Yeaman had both arms around him and the tackled player was still on his feet , so does that mean if the tackled player knowingly pushes the tackler towards the touchline making them both go over its a penalty ?? this rule needs clearing up ! plus Briers did not go to the mark to take the quick tap and scoot 20yds for them to score after the next tackle .
Obstruction for their 3rd try i think it was , and a forward pass to Morley for their last try , yes i agree the pass to Manu was forward for his try .Cant say anything about their 2nd try in touch or not but the south stand seem to think it was .
Fair enough we got beat and im sure a few of us were expecting a loss but its so annoying to lose like we did ,and before people mention it we had our chances ..

The ref missed things for both sides, like when King was clearly took out when chasing down a kick.

Makes me laugh how some people can say that the ref had a influence on the result, you didn't score a single point in the 2nd half to me that is excellent defense from the opposition is it not?

After reading this thread - this is the post I agree with.

My opinion Warrington were 6 or 7 points better than us, a couple of decisions went against us - they knew they'd been in a game today and we will play worse and win.

Manu's try was a mile forward, the better team won.

Steve Ganson's level of performance was below that required from a full time referee. It's no surprise and nothing will come of it.

Whilst I don't feel that we should have won, there were some odd decisions yesterday, maybe some rules have changed?

If someone passes the ball to someone else who is 4 yards in front of them, is that no longer forward, so long as you are wearing green?

If you dislodge the corner post whilst diving for a try, and the in touch judge does not move, should the referee not at least CONSULT the in goal judge before awarding the try?

Can teams in green hold down for as long as they like?

If a player is held up in a one-on-one tackle and then taken over the touch line, and the touch judge just waves that he's gone in touch, how can the referee explain giving a penalty?

Wish that game had been on TV, if only to watch some of the incidents back again, be a while until I can get the video.

Email Cummings. Does he still have an email address to email him so he can gie his responses to, or is that just when the games been on sky.

We were beaten by the better team but Ganson was inconsistent at best.

The way i see it, you can push into touch but not pull into touch.

Inconsistent though as some refs give it and others dont. Ganson technically was right by the letter of the law.