Same people who know next to knack all and in some cases don't even go, criticising a centre that has a better than 1 in 2 try scoring record over a ten year career and one that has represented GB and England.
Still the best defensive centre in the league.

Only on RLFans.

Some people are talking as much sh@ as the idiots on the daily mail site .

people are offering opinion, it's what RLFans is for, you don't have to go to every game to have an opinion, just like you don't have to live in West Hull to follow a West Hull side.....

I'm not sure what relevance Yeaman's past record has to how he's playing this season, or indeed the last few seasons. He deserved his GB call up and he's scored some great tries. That was then. This is now.

I don't go round saying West Hull is e though, do I?

Form is temporary and all that.

nope, and nor do I, in fact, I've not made comment about Hull for a fair while since it annoyed someone who's opinion I very much respect, KR fans are fair game, no matter where they come from.

Opinions are like s , everyones got one but most should be kept to themselfs .

but not yours, yours is better aired eh?

Poor decision by Yeamo and nobody knows that better than him. learn from it and move on.

Of course Yeaman is going to get criticism for not passing to his support players in a game breaking situation, it comes with the territory. FWIW Atkins got similar stick across at Warry for a recent slump in form.

To over criticise is wrong but it is also wrong to over protect. Kirk will be furious with himself I am sure but top class centres in that situation need to have better game awareness then Kirk showed last night. At International level it is the difference between a win or a loss such is the fine line between succes and failure at the top level.

Yeamans record at Hull is outstanding and defensively when he is on his game he is the best defensive centre I have seen at Hull over 30 plus years however attacking wise he has always lacked that X factor when it comes to putting his winger away.

I've no problem with people criticising Kirk, it's just the aggressive tone some people use. There's a fine line between critiquing, like you are, and just blatantly slagging someone off as others are.

There's a wider issue around some of our fans and an almost pre-meditated opinion on some of our players going both ways. Westerman gets some shocking treatment from some of our fans, at the other end of the scale is Whiting, who can never do wrong.

Completely agree. Social media now is such a powerful tool that players need educating on how to use and what to respond to because you will always get the abuse - genuine or not - because people can hide behind the anonymity of these sites hence keyboard warriors.

I am sure Kirk has heard it all before and its water of a ducks back but certain players may react differently and the club need to try to manage this because as you say they receive some shocking abuse which is totally OTT.

Well if the only thing they can criticise Yeamo for is the fact that he fancied his chances of scoring and didn't pass then in my opinion he's done very little wrong. He had a great game apart from this incident and nobody will be more upset than him that its caused this reaction from so-called fans.

Can't understand people brushing this under the carpet. Had the score been 18-20 would everyone dismiss it so lightly?
Whether he thought he could score or not he absolutely had to put Pitts under the sticks, it was pure greed/complete lack of awareness, either are criminal. As it happens he didn't stand a chance of taking Hardaker on the outside.