For me, it's never a good thing to be out of the cup but I know what you mean. As for big Sam, if that clown of a coach can continue to leave him out when our trundlers all come back, he is even more retarded than I thought (and that's a hell of a lot ). Last night was hardly a one-off after all.

As for all those people on here who were somehow defended the Radford/Dowes/Cusack wrecking combo, I would like to hear those opinions again, and whether they are actually still commonly held.

The title of this thread perfectly sums it all up for me...PROJECT MOA IS OVER !! btw AGAR OUT !!

He makes yards every hit up and is always looking for work, he has a big impact but 5 into 4 dosnt go, Its hard to take but Moa will be back in the stands when Radders returns.

Unfortunately it isn't baffling, it's what we've come to expect from agar

Cusack is leaving anyway.

got to admit again , based on last nights performance and that against Leeds he has looked the 2nd best prop we have.
I also thought he was a plodder earlier on but have to admit that he had a special game last night and looked the real deal in every aspect of his game, tackling was immense and his offloads are a joy to watch .
Have to say again though based upon many comments on here that I have been saying all season "what do the likes of Radford and Dowes and now Cussack bring to the team..
dowes is just too lightweight and offers nothing more than a cheap pay packet.
Radford, well Rommel has always been right I am afraid..
Cussack, looks very tired now and maybe it is a season too far from him

well done to Moa , I love it when players prove me wrong!!! just Hall and Yeaman to go now

IMO, for us to move forward with our squad and compete with the best next season, at least two of those three have to go. I know it's not easy to find a couple of good British props but that's what we will need.

Dowes and Radford offer so little that it's just painful to watch when they're on the pitch and Cusack, of whom I've never been a fan, looks to have gone a season too far.

In an ideal world, get rid of all three and replace them with Lynch, Scruton, LMS or any others that may be available next season. Not very likely though, I know.

couldnt agree with you more, however we all know we will see them both in black and white next year again and again..
Dowes I could accept as I am sure he is cheap but Radford cmon he is seriously painful to watch these days, he makes Cussack look like Ellery hanley

What's baffling is why.

Not his biggest fan but he played well last night.......for next season...Cusack going,get rid of Radford....try and get LMS and have O'Meley,Moa,LMS and Dowes as props with Lauaki as back up.

The more Sam plays the fitter and better he gets. Was the same last year. Regardless of what happens with the team injury situation his place in the team should now be secure until such time as his form over 5 or 6 games drops below standard. Hopefully injury permitting that would see him selected for the rest of the season.

Think Dowes needs to be shown the door too.

Moa was great last night, constantly bent the defensive line, hit hard and got some great offloads away. Not sure what more he can do to please Agar.

I think the side should have two impact style props and two workhorses, split evenly between the bench and the run on side. So for me it's a question of who misses out from Dowes, Radford and Yak. Personally whilst they are all similar I feel Yak/Radford offer the best defence, plus Radford offloads the ball well so I would drop Dowes.

Either way Moa has to play, it takes the pressure off O'Meeley and gets us on the front foot.

Surely Agar can see this?

Recent evidence suggests otherwise.