Sorry, no you are wrong. I have an unbiased eye. I watched the game not really bothered who won. I don't support Leeds, nor do I rate Bailey, but all I saw was Radford hold him down too long, Bailey struggle to get up and catch Radford head. Radford was the one who totally lost it.

Dont the hull fans get tired of looking for someone else to blame?

For what its worth I thought hull played well enough to win it with 12 men, and would probably gone on to win with a full compliment.

Good look this coming weekend.

Regardless of whether the elbows were deliberate or not, the attempted head-butt on Long was. If that's not a red card, then what is?

Luckily he missed,and Long didn`t milk it.

I've asked three Rhinos fans this on here but no-one seems to be able to answer, maybe you will:

Do you think four sharp jabs of the elbow is a good way of getting to your feet and what was he aiming for?

Anybody thats played before will know what I mean when I say you can tell where peoples heads are when your being tackled.
Elbowing it once could be seen as an accident, but several times is a clear way of trying to hurt an opposition player.

Exactly. I also made reference to the fact in an earlier thread that Radford would not have been able to tell whether it was a fist or an elbow, for all he knew it was Bailey attacking [ihim[/i.

Spot on..
ANother porter made the point once the elbow makes contact once anyone would realise it so why did he feel the need to do it several times more?...this proves the intention imo. Added to the fact the animal then decided to try and head butt longy with intention I can't understand why people can say he done nothing wrong..
Radders should publicly offer him to a boxing match ( for charity of course ) to give him the good pasting he deserves... for a good cause obviously

rob burroughs is baileys minder.

so back to the thread, has he been charged with anything?

No he hasn't. Suprise suprise. (according to The Gaurdian)

If not, it's an utter disgrace. Does the fact that his attempted head-butt didn't connect make him less guilty? The intent was very clearly there and the disciplinary panel should be ashamed of themselves if they take no action.

Use of forearm in 10th minute (Radford)
Decision No charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Player attempts to regain feet and play the ball, forearm makes unintentional contact with opponent, provokes opponent but no misconduct

It make unintentional contact 4 times