None of which has any relevance to the [inumber[/i of penalties compared to the other team. Neither is any of it relevant to the amount of possession. You don't need to make a value judgement of why the pens are happening to know that there are too many of them or that they're causing a problem. Now - if you wanted to get into a discussion about how justified they were, as you outline above, you'd need to have seen the game.


Yes, but your idea is flawed. Or at least partly. There are parts of a game that it's perfectly possible to get enough info about from a radio commentary to form an opinion , and parts that there aren't.

Rubbish, again.

There is no way you can have [iyour[/i own opinion on a game you never saw.

End of.

And you reckon that [iI'm[/i arrogant.

Just what I expected from you TBH. Oh well.

You a head master by any chance ?

I don't even know you. All I can go on is how you post on here. Unlike some, I don't confuse that with how someone is in real life. Maybe you're just taking things posted on a message-board far too seriously?

As for my last sentence...

You appear to have an extreme problem with anyone who disagrees with you on here, and a tendency to post aggressively. I've been unfailingly polite throughout our exchange and yet you've still not been able to return the favour. That's what I meant about your expected behaviour. Nothing more.

Oh yes - forgot this gem.

Which one of us has spent an entire thread dismissing other fans opinions out of hand again?

Then as usual you put a few paragraphs together and try to turn it around.
As for my last sentence...



Not at all, I debate well with most on here. In fact there is only you who winds me up because for years you just disagree with me for the sake of it and are always arrogant towards me.

Take the Horne threads for example, at times you try winding me up with comments such as "Horne could win MOS but you still wouldn't admit your wrong" or "is Horne still banging your missus?"

Is this still running? Argumentative sort, Mr Marrow.

I'm genuinely not sure what you mean by this.


A glance through this thread indicates otherwise. Your very first post is a sneering dismissal of a large number of posters.


I don't disagree with you for the sake of it. I don't even disagree with you all of the time. And not agreeing with you is not the same as being arrogant.


That first comment was a bit of TIC humour, and I put a at the end of it to clearly indicate as much. You then went off the deep end in response.

The second comment was, I admit, a wind-up in response to your constant and aggressive bagging of Horne. I probably shouldn't have done it. I did, however, assume that since you were happy to dish it out you'd be able to take it as well. I apologise for my mistake and any offence caused.

To be fair I'm guilty of keeping it running as well.

I'll pack it in now.

dont stop that was just getting interesting there!!

Have your own opinion and stop ar$e licking the clique.