at least!!!!!

All very pessimistic, we do tend to up our game against Saints who had a hard game yesterday and have a busy easter period as well.

I know we are playing poorly lately but i am still optimistic at the moment.

The first 5 games we rotated the bench properly.

For the third game running we've had Moa playing 10 or 15 mins and no Thacks giving us any impact and yesterday we only used 8 interchanges.

Therefore forwards are knackered, no go-forward, more defensive work and more tired.

Ill be optomistic! Saints will score most points 32 and rovers will get 28 past us....

Oh and the optomistic bit... We will get 34 against saints and 29 against Rovers ..

I'm gonna go for Rovers, Think Saints may be tired abit after a heavy schedule and may not be at there best.

Rovers 40+
Saints 30+

We can all dream Chiko
I will be happy with good performances with effort in both games.

Is that genuine?

cannot say for sure but there is no way we used the full amount.

I've just checked: news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 974587.stm Although they only quote 7 interchanges - they have missed the last Cusack for Washbrook (I think) interchange near the end. Probably missed it due to re-drafting their headline from 'Lucky gits Hull steal a victory'

I've just checked: news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 974587.stm Although they only quote 7 interchanges - they have missed the last Cusack for Washbrook (I think) interchange near the end. Probably missed it due to re-drafting their headline from 'Lucky gits Hull steal a victory'

To be fair, I think they have missed Radford's 2nd spell.... but that still only makes 9.

Rotation of the bench is really puzzling.

8 or 9 is still 3/4 changes not used, even if Moa was played in 2 10 minute spells it would have added more to the attack.

Agree.... add to that Dowes and Cusack where both on the bench at the same time again which coincided with Salford taking a grip on the game....
just like Cas and Quins??