If we are looking at SMC and Hull City corporation tax is only paid on a companies profits so the £200k would not be relevant, a little like your post!

I think the fans of Hull City should be equally worried. The man is obviously not rational and I wouldn't be surprised to see him walk away, especially if they don't get into the premiership this season.

Quote Mild mannered Janitor="Mild mannered Janitor"I understand that you have stated you will not comment further, but I can't help but thinking that you will keep an eye on this thread. Firstly, as has been pointed out, to the Allams The KC Stadium is not [itheir[/i property. Something a lot of City fans find hard to grasp. Secondly your comment of "Neither Hull City nor Hull FC have any right to to put pictures up." is difficult to verify. Despite not having read the lease agreement (something I doubt you will have either). I am confident there is nothing in the agreement between the tenants and SMC about hanging pictures on walls. I am also confident there is nothing in the agreement which states that either club CANNOT hang pictures on the walls. This leads to the main issue of implied terms of contracts. For the first 10 years of usage of the stadium there has been nothing preventing the showing of this memorabilia. Therefore it becomes implied that it is not a problem and its something which will not be challenged. Finally, and connected to the second point. The SMC cannot change the terms of a contract (written or implied) without the consent of both parties. Now that's the legals out of the way. If you cannot see the substance of what is happening, then you really do have a bigger issue to address.'" It seems city 1904 reckons he only came on here to wind us all up. . I just read a few of the threads on not 606.com, and talk about the hatred towards our club. Do most forums have a AUP?, because if they have, every rule in the book has been broken and thats just the City forum on there. Read here.www.not606.com/showthread.php/19 ... y-!/page13

Quote Mild mannered Janitor="Mild mannered Janitor"I understand that you have stated you will not comment further, but I can't help but thinking that you will keep an eye on this thread. Firstly, as has been pointed out, to the Allams The KC Stadium is not [itheir[/i property. Something a lot of City fans find hard to grasp. Secondly your comment of "Neither Hull City nor Hull FC have any right to to put pictures up." is difficult to verify. Despite not having read the lease agreement (something I doubt you will have either). I am confident there is nothing in the agreement between the tenants and SMC about hanging pictures on walls. I am also confident there is nothing in the agreement which states that either club CANNOT hang pictures on the walls. This leads to the main issue of implied terms of contracts. For the first 10 years of usage of the stadium there has been nothing preventing the showing of this memorabilia. Therefore it becomes implied that it is not a problem and its something which will not be challenged. Finally, and connected to the second point. The SMC cannot change the terms of a contract (written or implied) without the consent of both parties. Now that's the legals out of the way. If you cannot see the substance of what is happening, then you really do have a bigger issue to address.'" It seems city 1904 reckons he only came on here to wind us all up. . I just read a few of the threads on not 606.com, and talk about the hatred towards our club. Do most forums have a AUP?, because if they have, every rule in the book has been broken and thats just the City forum on there. Read here.www.not606.com/showthread.php/19 ... y-!/page13

And as a City fan you probably dont know who Raich Carter or Ken Wagstaff are let alone where Bopthferry Park was - Bandwaggoner

The city fans were livid re Pearson and Barmby gate. I agree they need to be worried, this man has no real interest in anything other than feathering his own nest, IMO.

Quote F.C. Aces="F.C. Aces"It seems city 1904 reckons he only came on here to wind us all up. . I just read a few of the threads on not 606.com, and talk about the hatred towards our club. Do most forums have a AUP?, because if they have, every rule in the book has been broken and thats just the City forum on there. Read here.www.not606.com/showthread.php/19 ... y-!/page13'" I know its unrelated but can someone tell me how many cups City have won in their illustrious history? I wasn't sure if I should laugh or cry at that forum thread.

Quote F.C. Aces="F.C. Aces"It seems city 1904 reckons he only came on here to wind us all up. . I just read a few of the threads on not 606.com, and talk about the hatred towards our club. Do most forums have a AUP?, because if they have, every rule in the book has been broken and thats just the City forum on there. Read here.www.not606.com/showthread.php/19 ... y-!/page13'" I know its unrelated but can someone tell me how many cups City have won in their illustrious history? I wasn't sure if I should laugh or cry at that forum thread.

I think to be fair at first they were livid with how the Allams treated Barmby but when they got in Bruce they saw they got the better man to try and take them up

Bruce isn't a better man than Barmby, he's a yes man

They are happy for now, but will be riled again soon enough.

Each pro club in this city has a glut of fickle fans.

It was a city fan that told me that unless they go up to increase their income next year, they will breach the new Fifa financial rules (the 2009 ones IIRC)
I have not read into it in any detail, as I couldn't care less to be honest (not a dig at City by the way)

Finally, I think we as a collective, need to get some more sensible city fans on our side. There are people that support both teams.

Main requirement for the Allams.

Kinell, id said that tongue in cheek, but he really does take the dont he

Main requirement for Allam the son is the biggest yes man