Now that's better and you'd certainly get my backing with that crazy style of rugby your proposing.

You really are sad. You know what i meant - In all sport when a team is playing well players want to be part of it but when the chips are down players may not rush back as quickly as they might of done. Thats all i was saying. To try and shape it into your sad little agenda is rather pathetic and epitomises whats wrong with this sad little board run by mrs queen bee know nothing.

Oh look its one of the queens little minions

Anyone seen Standee?

Grow up.

But unless there are posts I've missed, not quite one he has made. Not saying I agree with him on this or even most matters, but your interpretation seems off here (to me, at least) on the accusation you're throwing at him.

You must have missed this one...

You may have quoted the wrong post. That one doesn't appear to say what you (and Mrs B) think it does.

It's saying our players out injured would choose to play if we were doing better. What interpretation is needed other than deception is afoot?

Never happend before has it?

A coach goes and a player suddenly "comes back from injury"

I wonder what injury Bailey has

No, it actually doesn't, really. Especially when followed up with this




I'm not familiar with this style of posting, have I included enough quotes?

Ha ha ha Mrs (queen) B well and truly owned!!!!

Now if we can get back to the point i was making before it got twisted - are some of the injuries slightly indicative of players not wanting to play? Many have asked why the likes of Thompson and Green are suddenly injured when no injuries have been reported previously - to be frank can any of it be proportioned to players not wanting to play for Radford?