You appear to be confusing 'like a few' with getting 'ed', 'legless', 'a@rsholed' and 'p!ssed'.

mmm.... I seem to remember we had a world class aussie loose man who , with many other players , frequented W & Cat and all kinds of monkey business went on there , allegedly i hear . No-one ever ever said get rid. Shame on you 2 faced posters

just your av saturday night on the voddy

You know what he meant and its slightly different to Ian Huntley don't you think?

IN any event, I know what you are saying, but the message to the youngsters should be that if you are a bit average, then do not under any circumstances eff up, and aim to get better. If you are a lot better and eff up, you might get away with it.

According to the Club Statement...

'Hull FC have suspended Martin Aspinwall pending an internal....'

Regardless of what Aspinwall may have done, you have to admire Adam Pearson for his intention to carry out a full, thorough investigation!

I think we could and should be able to. We are paying them to be professional sportsmen. It is there only job to perform to their utmost best for the team and adapt their lifestyle to this affect.

If they know this before they sign we could kick out this culture completely. If they drink at all they lose a weeks wages as they are knowingly affecting their performance and unless they are top of the table they have scope to improve.

I'm only an amateur sportsman but wouldn't dream of drinking during endurance training blocks and haven't for the last 6-7 weeks.

In my experience when I've been at my fittest and performing at a high level I don't really fancy the thought of pints of beer. Maybe there's something in that......

There are Rules that have to be followed before you Sack or terminate a contract
its a Disciplinary Procedure All good Companies have them if not followed it could be costly to Club/Company ..Let wait the out come before we want rid of of the player

Disappointing, but hardly surprising.

In an ideal world you wouldn't have any players with reputations for excessive drinking or criminal behaviour in the squad. Realistically however, when considering signings, it is necessary to try to balance what a player can bring for you on the pitch with the level of risk they pose off it.

On that basis, Seymour was arguably worth the gamble. Aspinwall never was in a million years.

Where I agree with Sheldon is that, once the players are part of the club, you don't want to be seen making the same distinction. Again though, I can see how in reality doing that becomes almost inevitable.

That was exactly my point Garry.

It happens but it shouldn't, Smiggs was implying it should be the code of conduct.

It makes me wonder if the club implement media and social training, some of the comments on twitter makes me think otherwise, a night out for the players differs to ours immensely from male and female attention both positive and negative.

When fans and players say the should be able to celebrate or commiserate after the game with a few (to many) beers I disagree and so does Wayne Bennett.

As much as I loathe the Sun you cannot beat it for gossip www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... -Hull.html Still, I say not guilty until proven innocent Lol!

As much as I loathe the Sun you cannot beat it for gossip www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... -Hull.html Still, I say not guilty until proven innocent Lol!

Spot on.