Constant ill discipline.

Do people actually remember these incidents that get charged or do you all just moan, saying "O it's Hull, would get away if it was Leeds", the panel have reviewed footage and have a better view of the tackle than anybody else, happened right infront of me, after Brown passed the ball Ellis should charged him from behind when he didn't have the ball, deserves the ban he gets. Take off the tinted specs

He makes a great point.

Nobody is moaning about Ellis potentially getting a ban, it is the inconstancy, last with Paea when compared to Flower and this week Ellis compared to Westwood.

At least with tinted specs it's possible to see through the other side. From your post I can only assume you're blindfolded if you can't see what is actually being debated in regards to the judiciary.

"EGP"

Gets two match ban

So misses both Salford games

Don't have a problem with the poore charge, he is a liability at times but if dropping someone on their head is a grade C then how can someone just get a caution for the same offence. I thought the EPG was there for a '1st offence' but guess not.
I'll go back to Westwood not even being mentioned and you can hardly state good behaviour on his part.

Nightmare, must have been a fair call if he has done this.

Need Carvell back and Paea will be back for the cup game.

The games against Cas and Widnes resulted in seventeen incidents being reported to the disciplinary committee. (ok 3 were for the same gentle tackle on Whiting.)

Something is going drastically wrong somewhere.

As I said after the Paea charge I watched for any similar tackles over the weekend and not only were there loads of similar tackles there were several far worse ones and yet no charges made at all. The disciplinary process is an absolute joke. When you see the same or worse offences going unpunished you really have to call into question the integrity of the people making these decisions. At best they are incompetent fools and at worst they are bent.

EGP - 2 matches!!!

RFL strictly come dancing committee are massively inconsistent - got to believe it is incompetence rather than conspiracy, but we are seen as rebels now by RFL after voting against hetheringtons at restructure , and adams frank and honest comments about shambles at RFL over last year or so

but if you consider we were highest penalised side in SL for first 4 games perhaps we should consider the RFL citing committee were tasked to watch closely our last 2 games and found 17 instances worth following up - maybe our poor discipline early on cost us not just losses but also a target for RFL.

maybe we are a bit our own worst enemy when taking on the governing body

no paea and ellis as suspended makes radders job a little bit harder as these two are 100% effort and professional on and off field.

my honest belief is that we may have to suffer another season or 2 of mediocrity before the investment in youth brings us the halfback we have needed for 6 years to be a top 4 side. I know adam said mediocrity would not be a measure of success while he is at club but he maybe underestimated the mess and underinvestment he inherited and it took wigan year to turn around their structure to now relying on local talent.

I personally think this plan to rely on building a team based on local talent is a good one. I just hope the club and the fans have the stomach and patience to let it come to fruition. Unfortunately I can see performances like Sunday and the prospect of relegation seeing fans voting with their feet rather than sticking by the club through more mediocrity. Which would probably result in another change of tactics by AP.

I give in.

It's going to end up being RU.