What was wrong with it? He answered the questions he was asked.

The only thing i object to is the fact that they start talking about the dobins or going to the news when they could be talking to the fans who have been at the games. That goes for all their comentrys, after the game they go to the news. When the only people listening to Humberside at that point are only interested in sport not news.

Dont really like cooke but tbf he is the only one on blunderside(today) or the daily fail who is actually 50/50 down the middle .
Speaking of cooke has he got a book coming out or in the pipe line ? Would be a great read if it was true storys , would only buy it if money went to charity tho

I think next year is the last year Hull can take legal action against him before the time runs out, I am sure we will see a book after this deadline has gone. And if there is one I suggest that 1 Hull fan buys it, and then scans the whole thing online and we'll all read it from there!

Maybe its just me but I can`t stand the fella after the way he treat our club with his acrimonious move across the city. I want to hear peoples opinions on the game that I have attended, the fitness of the players after said games and the coaching staffs views on where we are heading. With Judas, and yes some of his comments are fair, but all the time with his cringing voice all I hear is him trying to curry favour with the listeners. He`s a nomark trying desperately to stay in the headlines, in my opinion.

Hopefully though the scanning will not degrade the quality of the crayon scrawlings!

It won't be just the possibility of legal action from Hull that would affect publication of Judas's book. Remember he was employed by a hateful ambulance chaser to whom facts are an inconvenience and who knows how to exploit the legal system. I wouldn't be surprised if there are restrictions on what he can say in his severance terms with the dobbins.

And despite having no regard for Judas for what he did, I have to admit he provides some interesting insights into the game.

I suspect RH invited him on, rather than him pitching up and demanding air time, so your complaint should be with their editorial choices in the first instance. In their defence, this is a fairly big breaking story in terms of Hull RL, and who better to comment on it than someone who's done it themselves?

If RH do an end of season RL review, frankly I'd be much more interested in Cooke's insight than that of Lloyd, Pinkney etc. Would be good to get a view that critically examines the relative seasons and direction of travel of the two clubs from someone not bothered whether their appraisal might upset the clubs.

Whatever your thoughts of him as a person, he's as far from a RL "no mark" in Hull as you can get, with his role on our most successful campaigns undisputed and arguably being the key factor in Rovers avoiding relegation.

Mrs Barista, For god sake , what are you on ? IF you are a F.C. fan why do you defend this - - - -
he proved what he thought of our club by going to THEM, i will never listen to or read Anything
this - - - - , has to say. I hope he rots in hell. and he is a no-mark !!!!

And Mrs Barista he was also the catalyst for our last five years of treading water with the also rans. HE was the reason for our DEMISE and he alone, with a modicum of help from Rule and Hetherington.

Doesn't make his views/opinions any less valid and he's certainly more knowledgable on the game than pretty much every poster on RLFANS

I think it was the other way around to be honest. Auntie Kath took the mick out of our club for years.
I'll never forgive Cooke for what he did, but the same fella gave me one of the best days of my life, and I personally think he has some good insight into the game, especially in this city.

Cooke didn't like the way things were going at the club , nor did we ultimately. He probably saw it coming and , unlike us as fans , had the option of walking away which he did. The reason for doing what he did was probably OK , maybe his long awaited book will tell us that , but the way he did it was wrong and unforgivable. Having said that I've rarely heard him speak anything but common sense on RL matters as a "pundit".

Cooke alone is to blame for disappointments 5 years after he left? OK, then. Nothing to do with us failing to source a replacement, clearly.

The reality is that the current RH set-up is weighted 4-1 in Rovers favour with varying levels of club apologism. They know if they are too brutal in their assessments the clubs will take their bat and ball home and they'll lose any snippets of signing news and player interviews. Cooke on the other hand has fallen out with both clubs and in my opinion gives outspoken but even-handed analysis and critique of both teams.

blunderside should bin pinkney and have cooke as expert summariser alongside richardson. They need someone else who doesn't constantly pretend everything is OK when it clearly isn't