missed that one guys , but if thats the case then he should be banned aswell

apparently mossop landed the finishing punch so he maybe at redhall but i dont think tuson will get a ban because he was walking away then got punched.

its rugby league and biff was a big part of the culture and it shouldn't be abolished from the game.

As I said on the VT, after some Gooners were claiming that neither Hock nor Tuson did anything wrongRetaliation is and always has been viewed as worse than the original offence, agree or disagree, it don't matter because that's the way it is.

If anyone thinks that only the three red-carded will be appearing at Red Hall this week, then they're gonna be in for a surprise. That game was supposed to be the showcase climax of the whole weekend and the players involved, not the referee, were to blame for what happened and the flat atmosphere following the incident. All three red cards will receive bans, along with at least a couple of other players.[/i

So was finishing work on a Saturday morning, climbing on your pushbike and pedalling to watch a game. Times have moved on.

It seems some Wigan fans are struggling to understand how Hock can be the instigator.

If Hock has been giving it big licks and trying to steal the head against some of the guys I used to play against he would have been on his backside wondering what had hit him.

really must of been some massive blokes to be honest he isn't a small lad is hock.

hock wasn't trying to steal the head (it doesn't matter these days as its passive) lms pushed hes head back into the scrum next micky macks and i know aswell as you do thats not the right head position in feeding the scrum.

LMS and Hock 10 mins...Tuson and Magennis both deserved red.Good old fashioned bit of biff no matter what the morons think on sky think,any neutral viewing would be loving that and will tune in for more.

i'd say thats more of a social change. every fans love biff and thats one of the main reasons as to why state of origin has become the most watched rugby game.

id hate to see league go down the same road as union where they have a few words after jumping on each other then have a little push and act the big man afterwards.

ok please tell me as to why it matters? and anyhow if lms didn't like it all he had to do was stand up tell the ref and hock would of been told to pack properly. but lms didnt do that he tried to man handle hock and hock wasn't having any of it and it turned into some love taps nothing major.

hock's name is a massive part to why some fans are calling for him to be put down.

It matters to a front rower when someone tries to dominate you in the scrum Hock was trying to be clever and LMS wasn't having any of it.
I know you may not like that fact but there it is.

That has nothing to do with it being Gareth Hock BTW.

so you agree then lms started the set to because he wasn't happy with hock. in all honesty it really doesn't matter both teams split from the scrum soon as the ball passes the 2nd rowers feet its hardly as if hock was angling for a better position to push or strike for the ball.

Why try it at all scrums are crap anyway and goes in the 2nd row.

No Hock started it by trying to steal the head.
How many more times do you want me to say it?
Oh wait let me guess I have a agenda against Hock right?

Ask Gareth Hock.