Meh. Less than 50 a game.

That Willie chappy has a lot to live up to if he's going to keep Rovers' end up.

great player, great leader, nuff said! true professional!

not doubting what a class player and a legend he is but it worries me that hes had to put that work in in 4 games!

Id rather not see a hull player in the top 5 tacklers hoping that would mean we had the ball in hand more then defending!

he's an absolute machine and completely focused ....

carnt say ive ever herd anyone critise the man tbh ,only thing ive heard peaple say is give the guy a fooking rest ,he should never have come back on this week ,the mans a great and will take sum replacing ,pity luke O:donell think hes at salford ,isnt available

luke o donnell v fitzgibbon?? Please!!!?

Didn't fitz play pretty much either 2nd row or prop for his whole NRL career?

Much as I respect Fitz for his fitness and workrate, I don't think Hull FC are getting the best out of him. For whatever reason the role he has played for all his time at the club is that of a prop grinding out the yards and blocking up the middle. One of my biggest problems with Agar is his insistance on playing a third prop at 13 but after reading that article I wonder who is now actually to blame for this.
When Westerman signed I thought, great, at last a ball handling loose forward. This should change the way the team plays, but so far there has been little change.
To improve the side, imo, Fitz should be played at prop and spelled, allowing Joe to play the full 80 at 13 and as the grounds start to firm up I think this is essential but I am concerned now that it would appear if Fitz wants to play 13, Fitz will play at 13

Indeed, and that is totally wrong if Agar is just letting Fitz do what suits himself.

BIG "if" but not the case

Good post, one which I agree with.

If the man himself is happy, then I'm happy. The only problem is that he won't be able to keep up that kind of work rate for the full season surely?