i like big sam and hope he gets a run out next week ,but to dislodge any of the current props he needs to up his workrate, he carrys the ball stronger than anyone but is not as fit as cussack or dowes or radders this is where the club have probs been working hard with him ,i think he may play next week if radders is injured ,tbf not a bad swop hope we have no more injuries Agar said on radio that long and horne had dead legs hope there fit

I was one who would have liked Moa in the 17 for this game , And for the reasons you have said.

I though our pack muscled up really well against once of the best drilled defences in SL.

And there's far more to being a prop than tackling. Moa is an impact player and we had little impact last night. 3 props who basically play the same game. Moa would have given us something different IMO

Said last week we missed his punch and showed again last night, thought cusack very average and will never punch a hole, also seems easy to bring down.

For me him and o Meley interchange makes the oposition worry.

after seeing the last two games, i'd definately keep cusack in the squad

even if radford has picked up a knock, selection headache or what.

after two wins, and a game against crusaders, i think a bit of solidarity is necessary. he can help steady the ship and like someone said, he attracts a few defenders. there's plenty of other players in our squad with attacking finesse

I'd put Moa in for the Crusaders game for one of Radford, Cusack or Dowes. Not that they've done out wrong just think its good to mix it up a bit and Moa will give us some more impact which we lacked when O'Meley was off.

Thought cusack did quite well last night, haven't seen the stats but probably made some good yards.
Having said that, definatley looking forward to seeing sam have a few shunts when he finally gets on the field

One thing that concerns me with Moa is that he is never going to play good enough to live up to the hype that is surrounding him.

we certainly lacked any go forward last night as soon as omeley went of and struggled to make yards. radders wasnt on the field for long due to taken a bang, dowesy was ok does what he normally does but thought cusack was poor to be honest. hes to robotic and upstraight and that leads to him being picked up and put on his back which results in a slow play the ball, he gives no impact whatsoever.

lets also give credit where it is due...
This Hudds side make no mistake is going to push for all honours this year based upon the fact they are solid in defence as bradford found last week!!
They cleverly ran at Hame to tire him out for long periods over and over which then showed in his ability to break tackles as he was a tad tired and we did exactly the same to Crabbie ..
Yak and Dowes ran their blood to water and both were outstanding in my book, especially Yak who lined up their big forwards everytime they had the ball and neither of their bog hitters made any yardage at all...
We played a top class side last night and beat them and beat them good !!

Whiting again .. outstanding

Cusack's always been smart enough and had the technique in the tackle to land on his knees and elbows, which enables him to get a quick PTB. I don't recall him being picked up and put in his back much if at all. He's excellent at what he does, which is work hard, take the ball up and attract plenty of defenders as well as putting a boat load of work in in defence. He's a quality player, but not a 'showy' or spectacular player. He'll do for me.