Why didn't FC ever sue? Because they'd have lost, probably. They still have time so maybe after then he'll make things public?

Strange comment from anybody that posts on here!

There was nothing to sue for. If what he is saying is true then there is no reason to keep quiet bout it. he'll write his book which will say he had a long running argument with teh club over his salary and testimonial and that is why he didn't sign his contract.

Not really.

And you expect non-twitterers to know this how? Don't really care what happened next - his initial tweet was a dig at Hull. I don't believe he'd word something similar if Rovers were the club in question, therefore to me he undermines his self-proclaimed neutrality. That opens up a few questions.


WTF has this got to do with my OP or my subsequent comments on this thread? You claim [iI'm[/i bitter - I'm still waiting for you to justify that.

Would you have posted this had anybody but Paul Cooke said it? I doubt it. I don't have to justify the bitterness comment, the fact you started the thread says it all. If you're not bitter you're obsessed, other people have said negative things about us, why not post that stuff? Because it wasn't said by Paul Cooke, simple.

Conversing with people on Twitter is no more or less sad than conversing on here.

Are we STILL talking about Paul Cooke?

I've stated several times why I posted it. To quote... er, you, how hard is it to read posts? But again, just for you:







Still waiting for your explanation of my bitterness, though:

I'd agree if it's just ordinary people but when you're hanging on every word of some z list celebrity and getting a semi on when they actually acknowledge you exist then it is significantly different

I hardly follow any celebs. I commented my feelings on cooke the other day and as he was tagged in the post he could see it and responded. We chatted for a while, I had my oponion and he has his. I don't follow him and have no intention of doing so.