carnt understand this,we had a great relationship with smc,the way they worked to get our play off game with bradford on at kc was a credit to them ,i wonder if the rugby league are asking for the stadium for next to nothing ,that wouldnt supprise me ,they would rather have it at galpharn ,i will reserve my judgement on this untill i hear the full story ,sounds like a bit of mail spin here

dont have a heart attack mate ,the RFL probs want the place for nowt knowing them tits ,i find it hard to believe its just about dates as the rfl are stating ,but if it is then duffen is a compete w***ker and wants to remember many hull city fans are rugby fans also from both sides ,so he as just ed off many of his customers

Doesnt matter that im red and white, im with all the posters on here. 4 internationals and all crowds of 20000+, of which I attended all. Its a disgrace and I hope the SMC realise we may be overlooked in the future.

That'll be the Cllr Minns that didn't want the Stadium in the first place you're saying that too would it?

It's not a Hull City thing, it's more likely a commercial decision. RL simply isn't commercially attractive.

25000 full capacity isn't commercially attractive? you are a daft lad.



The bulk of the community don't care about RL. 12,000 over a dozen or so games...

with your 20 odd k supporters and a combined 20 odd k RL supporters in the City..seems like the community cares as much for the tiggers


It had to be played at the football stadium because RL Stadiums are not built with big crowds in mind. Your comment disproves your point.


Of course we are a minority sport compared to the PL, but historically we filled those for Internationals, as we do for the GF at OT and CC at Wembley.
Old Trafford welcome the RL with open arms and make efforts to accommodate us.

You can support your national team, at whatever venue decides to host the event.From a business perspective, it seems it's not cost effective here.

There hasa been previous Internationals at the KC and proved to be very profitable for both parties. You have missed the point, its not about being cost effective, it's about not agreeing on a date

In the first place, it would seem he does have the right to not play it at the KC. In the second he's not stopping you watching it.


The RFL wanted to bring the game here as it would have been good business with a sell out gate, And just reward for loyal support of the International game in Hull, Duffen is out of touch with the people of Hull and the history of RL in this City.

In my opinion he does not have the right to deny the RL support in this City to see an International game when offered by the governing body.

You must be Duffens rent boy as I have spoken to lots of City supporters and they all agree Duffen is out of order and has over stepped the mark.
You are the only one in agreement with him. Tool.

Rent boy? Grow some pubes before commenting, you just show your stupidity and ignorance.



I haven't said if I agree or disagree with the decision, I simply pointed out some of the many errors in your argument.

No errors in the post sunshine, you may think so, so I put you right on your errors.

Duffens 'unavailability for comment' speaks volumes, what is pathetic sunshine is you trying to speak for him.
haven't you got something to worry about at your own club sonny jim.

You do realise that MUH has an alarm that goes of in his living room if anyone on here types any of the following Hull City/SMC/Duffen/Pearson.

The post where you 'put me right' must have been deleted, all I can see is your inaccurate ramblings.

Try reading my post again when you've lost the Hull City chip off your shoulder.

You won't be payed any money for moving full stop , people are losing their jobs in Hull haven't you heard of the credit crunch.

Agree with you there planning is difficult around the boulevard .

I was always under the impression from your supporters that you were equal partners in the stadium are things now changing ?

Who gives a t@ss were crap anyway